Borna Gojo vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Gojo vs M. Gigante

Borna Gojo
CRO
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
23
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
220
C. Rank
141
72
Best Rank
125
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$669.6K
Career Money
$571.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Matteo Gigante
ITA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
23
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
220
C. Rank
141
72
Best Rank
125
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$669.6K
Career Money
$571.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-To-Head: Gojo 1 - 0 Gigante
They have played 2 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 2 and Matteo Gigante winning 0. The last match between Borna Gojo and Matteo Gigante was at the Ortisei Challenger, 24-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Borna Gojo getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gojo | 1 |
Gigante | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) Ortisei Challenger(10-24-22)
Borna Gojo
6
6
Matteo Gigante
2
4
B. Gojo vs M. Gigante H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$669,560 | Career Prize Money | $571,445 |
58.72% (256-180) | Career Total W/L | 57.73% (168-123) |
1 | Indoor | 0 |
2 | Titles | 6 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0.00% (0-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (5-5) |
B. Gojo vs M. Gigante Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Borna Gojo has won 44.08% of points on their second serve, while Matteo Gigante has won 45.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Borna Gojo, in recent form, has won 44.69% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matteo Gigante has won 48.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.72% and 26.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Borna Gojo has saved 51.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matteo Gigante has saved 56.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Borna Gojo has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 25/ 16), with Matteo Gigante winning 53.45% (W/L 25/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Borna Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 121/ 75), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Matteo Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 58/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Borna Gojo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.91% of matches (W/L 17/ 6), where as Matteo Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 17/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Borna Gojo winning 1 times and Matteo Gigante being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 2 and Matteo Gigante winning 0. The last match between Borna Gojo and Matteo Gigante was at the Ortisei Challenger, 24-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Borna Gojo getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:16.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Borna Gojo has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.07 while Matteo Gigante has played against players with an average rank of 191.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Borna Gojo has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matteo Gigante has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Borna Gojo has converted 27.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matteo Gigante has converted 32.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Borna Gojo vs Matteo Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Gojo vs M. Gigante H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
0:54:16 | Avg. Match Time | 0:54:16 |
53% (23/43) | 1st Serve % | 54% (25/46) |
96% (22/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17/25) |
70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
41% (19/46) | Return Pts Won % | 16% (7/43) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Gojo 49%, Gigante 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Gojo 50%, Gigante 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Gojo 62%, Gigante 61%.
B. Gojo Recent Matches Played
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played

B. Gojo vs M. Gigante Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.72% (256/180) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.73% (168/123) |
56.80% (593/451) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.28% (382/309) |
52.54% (5434/4909) | Games Win/Loss | 51.96% (3393/3137) |
61.73% (121/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.44% (58/28) |
54.87% (62/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.26% (96/66) |
60.58% (63/41) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26.47% (9/25) |
43.48% (10/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
0.66 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
3321 | Aces Total | 928 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
1415 | Total Double Faults | 1005 |
1:37:27 | Average Match Time | 1:35:59 |
432.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.72 |
62% (19422/31096) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11746/19856) |
74% (14328/19422) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8026/11746) |
49% (5766/11674) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4008/8110) |
40% (1070/2664) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (916/2119) |
37% (11446/30635) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8239/20108) |
56.25% (18/14) | Slam W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
50.00% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
60.00% (9/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
48.94% (23/24) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
61.13% (151/96) | Challenger W/L | 56.84% (108/82) |
59.26% (48/33) | Futures W/L | 72.55% (37/14) |
59% (250/427) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (163/280) |
63% (5/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
53% (113/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (50/90) |
52% (86/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) |
82% (257/211) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (172/136) |
18% (257/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (172/34) |
24% (178/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (119/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.1
W2
1.33
07:00 AM 22/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.8
W2
1.93
08:00 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.99
W2
1.75
09:00 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.28
W2
3.4
08:30 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.45
W2
2.59
08:10 AM 22/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.81
W2
1.39
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Gojo (Jingshan Challenger)
Gojo vs BoyerCould play in The Quarterfinals
Gojo vs HanfmannCould play in The Quarterfinals
Gojo vs PirosCould play in The Second
Gojo vs SmithCould play in The Second
Gigante (Orleans Challenger)
Barrere vs GiganteCould play in The Second
Engel vs GiganteCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 0-1
06:00
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo
Japan
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Buenos Aires Challenger
Argentina
Columbus Challenger
United States
Jingshan Challenger
China
Las Vegas Challenger
United States
Lisbon Challenger
Portugal
Orleans Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Budapest
Hungary
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M15 Forbach
France
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hurghada
Egypt
M15 Kayseri
Turkey
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Otopeni
Romania
M25 Falun
Sweden
M25 Nevers
France
M25 Pardubice
Czech Republic
M25 Sabadell
Spain
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Zlatibor
Serbia